chomskybot: Analogously, 61% of the methodological work in modern linguistics is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Summarizing, then, we assume that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features suffices to account for the strong generative capacity of the theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the systematic use of 9 complex symbols is not quite equivalent to a stipulation to place the constructions into these 10 categories. Comparing these examples with their 2-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: #1300) and (link: #1981), we see that relational information is unspecified with respect to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #424). Of course, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose a descriptive fact. cc @question

Analogously, 61% of the methodological work in modern linguistics is rather different from nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Summarizing, then, we assume that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features suffices to account for the strong generative capacity of the theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the systematic use of 9 complex symbols is not quite equivalent to a stipulation to place the constructions into these 10 categories. Comparing these examples with their 2-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: #1300) and (link: #1981), we see that relational information is unspecified with respect to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #424). Of course, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose a descriptive fact. cc @question